The number of children in poverty is rocketing. Who is protecting them? | Frances Ryan

It’s telling that those zealots who want to defend the ‘unborn child’ are complicit in policies that impoverish women and children

One of the most remarkable things that came out of the Irish referendum was the personal testimony of women who had been forced to journey to England for medical care. But some – poor or migrant or disabled women – recounted how even this option wasn’t available to them; unable to travel, they had no choice but to take the gamble of a pill bought from the internet. It’s a striking insight into the black-and-white thinking imposed on pregnancy: women who could not even afford a flight on Ryanair for a safe abortion were somehow expected to be able to afford to feed, house and clothe a child.

Beyond Ireland, this denial of the material reality of raising a child is an ongoing issue – in abortion debates and beyond. Indeed, the same voices so ardently protecting the “unborn child” are often strangely quiet when it comes to support for children once they are outside the womb. This convenient cognitive dissonance has long been a feature of rightwing attitudes: arguing to restrict a woman’s reproductive rights while supporting measures that push children into poverty. (Some British rightwing – often male – journalists couldn’t resist stepping in over the Irish debate too.)

Related: After the abortion vote, I want to thank Britain. You were there for Irish women | Anne Enright

Related: Third of poorer families in England missing out on free food vouchers

Continue reading...

from Children | The Guardian https://ift.tt/2xotGAJ