Bickering over a disputed report shows how little we know about the perpetrators
Few debates about academic methodology result in a researcher being labelled a “posh socialist ‘activdemic’” or another being told that her work is akin to a BNP leaflet. But this is no ordinary academic debate. It’s about Asian “grooming gangs” and a report on the issue published last year by the anti-extremism thinktank the Quilliam Foundation.
Thanks to a series of high-profile court cases, the question of Asian and, specifically, Muslim grooming gangs has become an incendiary issue. Quilliam and its chairman, Maajid Nawaz, divide opinion. For some, they are a scourge on political correctness, bravely shining a light on dark corners of Muslim communities. For others, they give succour to bigots.
In many small towns, Asians control the night-time economy – working in takeaways or driving minicabs
Continue reading...from Children | The Guardian https://ift.tt/2DgC2vx
0 commentaires:
Enregistrer un commentaire